Gedankenstrich.org

In der Reihe Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Organisations- und Innovationssoziologie ist ein neues Discussion Paper mit dem Titel »Open Source Projects as Incubators of Innovation. From Niche Phenomenon to Integral Part of the Software Industry« (Volltext) erschienen:

Over the last 20 years, open source development has become an integral part of the software industry and a key component of the innovation strategies of all major IT providers. Against this backdrop, this paper seeks to develop a systematic overview of open source communities and their socio-economic contexts. […] Further, I examine why open source projects have mainly lost their subversive potential while, in contrast to former cases of collective invention, remaining viable beyond the emergence of predominant solutions and their commercial exploitation: In an industry that is characterized by very short innovation cycles, open source projects have proven to be important incubators for new product lines and branch-defining infrastructures. They do not compete against classical forms of production but instead complement and expand these.

Zum Text »

Heute ist der Artikel »The Logic of Digital Utopianism« von Sascha Dickel und mir in Nano Ethics erschienen.

With the Internet’s integration into mainstream society, online technologies have become a significant economic factor and a central aspect of everyday life. Thus, it is not surprising that news providers and social scientists regularly offer media-induced visions of a nearby future and that these horizons of expectation are continually expanding. This is true not only for the Web as a traditional media technology but also for 3D printing, which has freed modern media utopianism from its stigma of immateriality. Our article explores the fundamental semantic structures and simplification patterns of popular media utopias and unfolds the thesis that their resounding success is based on their instantaneous connectivity and compatibility to societal discourses in a broad variety of cultural, political, or economic contexts. Further, it addresses the social functions of utopian concepts in the digital realm.

In der aktuellen Ausgabe der Zeitschrift Technikfolgenabschätzung – Theorie und Praxis bespricht Christoph Schneider meinen Band »Open-Source-Projekte als Utopie, Methode und Innovationsstrategie« (Amazon) wie folgt:

[…] Jan-Felix Schrape nimmt sich in seinem angenehm kurzen und gut strukturierten Büchlein dem wahrscheinlich einflussreichsten Ursprungsort der heutigen digitalen ›Offenheit‹ an: Der Open-Source- Software-Entwicklung. […]
Weiterlesen »

In den WSI Mitteilungen 8/2016 ist heute der Artikel »Open-Source-Projekte: vom Nischenphänomen zum integralen Bestandteil der Softwareindustrie« erschienen, der die Ergebnisse meiner Studie zur Entwicklung von quelloffenen Softwareprojekten zusammenfasst, aktualisiert und in einen gesellschaftspolitischen Kontext stellt:

Weiterlesen »

Das PEW Research Center hat vor einigen Tagen eine Studie zur US-amerikanischen Plattformökonomie veröffentlicht (vgl. zum Phänomen der »Plattformlogik als digitale Marktordnung«: Kirchner/Beyer 2016a, 2016b). Ihre Ergebnisse basieren auf einer Befragung von ca. 4000 US-Amerikanern via Mail und Web:

»In the context of gig employment, nearly one-in-ten Americans (8%) have earned money in the last year using digital platforms to take on a job or task. Meanwhile, nearly one-in-five Americans (18%) have earned money in the last year by selling something online, while 1% have rented out their properties on a home-sharing site. Adding up everyone who has performed at least one of these three activities, some 24% of American adults have earned money in the ›platform economy‹ over the last year.

[…] Participation in labor platforms, for example, is more common among blacks and Latinos than among whites, more common among those with relatively low household incomes than those with relatively high household incomes, and more common among young adults than any other age group. But when it comes to capital platforms such as online selling, the reverse is true […]. Some 60% of labor platform users say that the money they earn from these sites is ›essential‹ or ›important‹ to their overall financial situations, but just one-in-five online sellers (20%) describe the money that they earn in similar terms.«

In der Reihe Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Organisations- und Innovationssoziologie ist ein neues Discussion Paper mit dem Titel »Social Media, Mass Media and the ›Public Sphere‹. Differentiation, Complementarity and Co-existence« (Volltext) erschienen:

In modern society, ›the public‹ is inevitably a mediated sphere as only media can bridge its spatial, temporal and topical diversity. While this media has traditionally been mass media (one-to-many), the arrival of the Internet has popularised meso media (many-to-many). In that context, the mediated public sphere has undergone significant changes. On the one hand, media theorists emphasise the enabling characteristics of digital media, hoping for an egalitarian public sphere and an empowerment of media users. On the other hand, critics discuss the regulatory attributes of social media platforms, which allow to preformat and to sanction communication more efficiently than ever before.

This overview paper discusses the generic relationship between social media and mass media from a systems-theoretical point of view. Further, it addresses the question of whether the social web is in fact on the path to democratising the ›public sphere‹.

Zum Text »

Im Blog des Soziologie Magazins diskutieren Andreas Bischof und Vivien Sommer entlang des Lehr-Lern-Projektes »Medien und Asyl« die Arbeit von qualitativ-empirisch forschenden Soziologinnen und Soziologen, die am Rande ihrer Disziplin beschäftigt sind – etwa als Lehrende in angrenzenden Fachbereichen oder als ›Dienstleister‹ in Technik- und Entwicklungsprojekten. Die Autoren kommen dabei unter anderem zu folgendem Schluss:
Weiterlesen »